Yes, when it's coached. What the AAP, the NSCA and a 20-author consensus say about kids lifting, where injuries come from, and what a first class is like.
Yes, when it's coached.
That's the short answer, and it's also what the medical and coaching bodies who've studied this say.
The American Academy of Pediatrics, the National Strength and Conditioning Association, and a 2014 international consensus signed by paediatricians, sports medicine doctors and strength coaches all land in the same place.
Kids and teens can train for strength safely, as long as someone teaches them the technique and watches them do it.
I've coached kids this age for over ten years.
If you're asking this question, you're asking the right one.
Here's what the evidence says, where the injuries actually come from, and what it looks like in my room.
The American Academy of Pediatrics put out its most recent report on this in 2020.
Its wording is plain: children and adolescents can gain strength with resistance training with low injury rates if the activities are performed with an emphasis on proper technique and are well supervised.
The NSCA position statement says the same thing in seven points.
The first is that a properly designed and supervised program is relatively safe for youth.
The other six are the benefits: stronger, more powerful, better movement skill, a better cardiovascular risk profile, fewer sports injuries, better psychosocial well-being, and more likely to keep exercising as an adult.
The 2014 international consensus was written by twenty authors across paediatric medicine, exercise science and strength coaching, and endorsed by the professional bodies in those fields.
It says the same thing.
Nobody in the research is arguing the other side.
This is the one I hear most.
Somebody told you lifting weights before puberty damages the growth plates and stunts growth.
The NSCA looked for it.
Their statement says that to date, injury to the growth cartilage has not been reported in any prospective youth resistance training research study.
The AAP report says appropriately designed programs have no apparent negative effect on linear growth or physeal health.
Physeal means growth plate.
The growth plate injuries that do show up in emergency rooms come from something else, and that's the next section.
The AAP report is direct about it: most injuries reported from resistance training occur on home gym equipment, with unsafe behaviour, in unsupervised settings.
The NSCA lists the causes: improper lifting technique, maximal lifts, too much weight, poorly designed equipment, ready access to the equipment, and lack of qualified adult supervision.
Read that list again.
Every item on it is a 14 year old alone in a basement with his dad's bench, seeing how much he can press.
Not one of them is a 12 year old learning to squat with a coach standing beside her.
For scale, one study compared injury rates across sports and found weight training at about 0.0035 injuries per 100 hours of participation.
Soccer was 6.2.
Rugby was 1.9.
Basketball was 0.03.
Done properly, strength training is one of the safest things your kid can do with an hour.
The evidence says technique first, light weights first, and a coach watching.
That's the whole program.
Every lift is taught before any weight goes on.
A 12 year old in their first week squats with no weight, hinges with a light kettlebell, presses a dowel or an empty bar, and pulls a band.
They learn the position before they learn the weight.
The weight goes up a little at a time, when I decide they're ready, not when they ask.
Nobody maxes out.
Nobody tests a one rep max.
There are ten kids in the room and I coach every rep of every session myself, so nothing happens on the floor that I don't see.
The AAP guidance for a beginner is one to two sets of eight to twelve reps at a light weight, two or three days a week on non-consecutive days.
That's exactly what a first month at the Academy looks like.
How many days a week is its own question, and it has its own post.
The NSCA statement also says when not to do it: if qualified supervision, age-appropriate equipment and a safe training environment aren't available, youth should not perform resistance exercise.
So here's my honest advice.
If the choice is a coached class or nothing, do the coached class.
If the choice is a coached class or a home gym with nobody watching, do the coached class.
If the only option is the unsupervised home gym, wait.
The first Academy class is free.
Bring your kid, watch from the door, and decide afterward.
Monday to Thursday at 4:00 or 5:00, ages 12 to 18, ten kids a class.
Any questions before that, email me at trevor@takecontroltraining.com and I'll answer them myself.
Book the free first class: https://tctgym.com/classes/tct-academy
1. Stricker PR, Faigenbaum AD, McCambridge TM; AAP Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness. Resistance Training for Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics. 2020;145(6):e20201011. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-1011
2. Faigenbaum AD, Kraemer WJ, Blimkie CJR, et al. Youth Resistance Training: Updated Position Statement Paper From the National Strength and Conditioning Association. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2009;23(Suppl 5):S60-S79. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31819df407
3. Lloyd RS, Faigenbaum AD, Stone MH, et al. Position statement on youth resistance training: the 2014 International Consensus. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014;48(7):498-505. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092952
4. Hamill BP. Relative Safety of Weightlifting and Weight Training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 1994;8(1):53-57. https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/abstract/1994/02000/relative_safety_of_weightlifting_and_weight.8.aspx
Sources 1, 2 and 4 were opened and the quoted sentences checked against the full text on 28 September 2026. Source 3's citation and abstract were checked against the Cardiff Metropolitan and Salford university repository records; the full text is paywalled.