Yes, when it is coached. What the AAP, the NSCA and a 20-author consensus say about kids lifting, where injuries come from, and what a first class is like.
Yes, when it is coached.
That is the short answer, and it is also what the medical and coaching bodies who have studied this say.
The American Academy of Pediatrics, the National Strength and Conditioning Association, and a 2014 international consensus signed by paediatricians, sports medicine doctors and strength coaches all land in the same place.
Kids and teens can train for strength safely, as long as someone teaches them the technique and watches them do it.
I have coached kids in this age group for over ten years.
The parents who ask me this question are asking the right thing.
Here is what the evidence says, where the injuries actually come from, and what it looks like in my room.
The American Academy of Pediatrics put out its most recent report on this in 2020.
Its wording is plain: children and adolescents can gain strength with resistance training with low injury rates if the activities are performed with an emphasis on proper technique and are well supervised.
The NSCA position statement says the same thing in seven points.
The first one is that a properly designed and supervised program is relatively safe for youth.
The other six are the benefits: stronger, more powerful, better movement skill, better cardiovascular risk profile, more resistant to sports injuries, better psychosocial well-being, and more likely to keep exercising as an adult.
The international consensus from 2014 was written by twenty authors across paediatric medicine, exercise science and strength coaching, and endorsed by the professional bodies in those fields.
It says the same thing.
Nobody in the research is arguing the other side.
The argument was settled a long time ago.
This is the one I hear most.
Parents have been told that lifting weights before puberty damages the growth plates and stunts growth.
The NSCA looked for it.
Their statement says that to date, injury to the growth cartilage has not been reported in any prospective youth resistance training research study.
The AAP report says appropriately designed programs have no apparent negative effect on linear growth or physeal health.
Physeal means growth plate.
The growth plate injuries that show up in emergency rooms come from something else, and the next section is about that.
The AAP report is direct about it: most injuries reported from resistance training occur on home gym equipment, with unsafe behaviour, in unsupervised settings.
The NSCA lists the causes: improper lifting technique, maximal lifts, excessive loading, poorly designed equipment, ready access to the equipment, and lack of qualified adult supervision.
Read that list again.
Every item on it is a 14 year old alone in a basement with his dad's bench, seeing how much he can press.
Not one item on it is a 12 year old learning to squat with a coach standing beside her.
For scale, a study that compared injury rates across sports found weight training at about 0.0035 injuries per 100 hours of participation.
Soccer was 6.2.
Rugby was 1.9.
Basketball was 0.03.
Strength training, done properly, is one of the safest things your kid can do with an hour.
The evidence says technique first, light loads first, and a coach watching.
That is the whole program.
Every lift is taught before it is loaded.
A 12 year old in their first week squats with no weight, hinges with a light kettlebell, presses a dowel or an empty bar, and pulls a band.
They learn the position before they learn the load.
Loads go up a little at a time, when I decide they are ready, not when they ask.
Nobody maxes out.
Nobody tests a one rep max.
There are ten kids in the room and I coach every rep of every session myself, so nothing happens on the floor that I do not see.
The AAP guidance for a beginner is one to two sets of eight to twelve reps at a light load, two or three days a week on non-consecutive days.
That is exactly what a first month at the Academy looks like.
The NSCA statement also says when not to do it: if qualified supervision, age-appropriate equipment and a safe training environment are not available, youth should not perform resistance exercise.
So here is my honest advice.
If the choice is a coached class or nothing, do the coached class.
If the choice is a coached class or a home gym with nobody watching, do the coached class.
If the only option is the unsupervised home gym, wait.
The first Academy class is free.
Bring your kid, watch from the door, and see what a coached session looks like before you decide anything.
Monday to Thursday at 4:00 or 5:00 PM, ages 12 to 18, ten kids a class.
Book the free first class: https://tctgym.com/classes/tct-academy
1. Stricker PR, Faigenbaum AD, McCambridge TM; AAP Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness. Resistance Training for Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics. 2020;145(6):e20201011. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-1011
2. Faigenbaum AD, Kraemer WJ, Blimkie CJR, et al. Youth Resistance Training: Updated Position Statement Paper From the National Strength and Conditioning Association. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2009;23(Suppl 5):S60-S79. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31819df407
3. Lloyd RS, Faigenbaum AD, Stone MH, et al. Position statement on youth resistance training: the 2014 International Consensus. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014;48(7):498-505. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092952
4. Hamill BP. Relative Safety of Weightlifting and Weight Training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 1994;8(1):53-57. https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/abstract/1994/02000/relative_safety_of_weightlifting_and_weight.8.aspx
Sources 1, 2 and 4 were opened and the quoted sentences checked against the full text on 28 September 2026. Source 3's citation and abstract were checked against the Cardiff Metropolitan and Salford university repository records; the full text is paywalled.